Abstract Art Paintings Are Open To Interpretation
Many painters of realistic artworks are extremely talented. They can capture an instant superbly - whether that is a lush landscape, stormy seascape, authentic looking still-life or a striking likeness of an individual in a portrait. However - as skillful as these artists are - the same result may be obtained with a photograph taken with a contemporary camera. Artistic embellishments can even be made following the photograph is taken.
The question could therefore be asked: Are these life-like reproductions truly "Art"?
On the other hand, an abstract artist produces the painting from within. best abstract artists The artist has some vision that they wish to capture and display for others to see. The artwork might not resemble anything "real" - but the mixture of colours used together with shapes, shading and textures seeks to represent what the artist desires to convey. This is based on the artist's mood, feelings and insights at the time of the abstract painting's creation.
One of many beauties of abstract art paintings is that seldom will art observers have exactly the same interpretation of the artwork. Although they have the exact same physical input from the artist - each viewer also comes with their own past experiences, viewpoints and biases. They'll have their particular particular mood and feelings at the time of observation. The environment in that the abstract artwork is displayed also significantly influences the viewing experience. Every one of these factors contribute to the interpretation produced by that particular art critic being quite unique. (I am not referring here to the unfortunate and artificial situation in art schools where students frequently learn the accepted interpretations from previous "art experts".)
Will the observer's interpretation be exactly like that intended by the artist? Not necessarily.
But does this matter? The uniqueness of interpretation of abstract art is its major strength.