Abstract Painting - Abstract ... What does the Word Mean?
Webster defines abstract as: a.considered aside from a particular instance, b.expressing a quality independent of the object or c. having only intrinsic form with little if any pictorial representation. Quite simply; taking an object and emphasizing its core fundamentalness. All three definitions very easily fit abstract painting in showing, telling, drawing and painting ab muscles essence of the object without actually depicting the item itself.
How can an abstract painter arrive at an abstract design? Many stated which they started with a representational motif, that the motif was something readily identifiable. Then they dissected the motif as we say, searching for the bare bones, the essence of the object. They expressed this essence with colorful shapes, some beautiful, some drab, and some just plain ugly.
In any type of painting the artist is building a statement. contemporary art artists It's easy to express pretty pink flowers in a representational painting. What the abstract artist has to say must be said with his/her simple means; brush marks, color and interesting shapes. Also, since color is arbitrary, color reaches the artist's whim, and may or may not be pretty and has nothing regarding the painting's success.
To make a meaningful statement without a recognizable subject is daunting. It's not a matter of simply looking and drawing. She or he must use all their wiles to activate us in dialog making use of their art, being limited, or we ought to say, unlimited, with unrecognizable shapes and unrelated (to the object) color. The artist must interest and talk to the viewer through form and color.
A poor, wishy washy, pretty pink flower painting says, "Weak, wishy washy pretty pink flowers!" Bright, bold colors, without form and substance in a abstract painting says, "No form and no substance!" Neither painting is successful.
So..... here we stand facing the artwork, having no understanding of abstract art, its purpose and intention. We would like to respond but we are without a clue. So, we hesitate before the art work, we don't know very well what to express, we don't react to along with or design, so, we leave saying, or at the least thinking, "That artist should be nuts!" And wondering what the painting was all about. What was its purpose? Was it good art or not?
There are a few individuals who are of the opinion that the painting must certanly be representational to be good art. And if they can't see every hair on the pinnacle and every leaf on the tree, then the art isn't good. That simply isn't true. You might choose the see every hair but that's definitely not a sign of good art.
What guidelines do we have in judging abstract paintings merits? The guidelines that representational painters must follow are the same for the abstract painter. The work should have readable values, color harmony and dominance, repetition with variety in shapes, colors and lines, all that concerns good art must be in abstract art.
A collection of wild colors and shapes does not necessarily total up to good art in abstraction or representational art. A great abstract may be more difficult to pull off than representational art because the artist is depending on his imagination and intuition to produce something meaningful and of value. (not necessarily monetary value)
In trying to understand abstract (non-representational) art, approach it with the theory at heart to simply appreciate what's before you. Sometimes the title gives us a clue as to what the painting is about. That helps. Then look and observe how it affects you.
Does along with speak to you? Are you lifted up or cast down by the color? You could have some reaction to a bit of art work, it will move you for some reason, perhaps little, perhaps a good deal. Identify what it is. Good art, whether abstract or representational, sets a mood, tells a story, however subtle, intrigues and interests the viewer, and as a result, each painting should be appreciated alone merits.