My professor, upon the first works told me that I would have a legacy, and that it would take a long time for me in particular, outside the afore mentioned claims, but that she didn't want to tell me why because I would be hurt. She said "it" meaning s, cs, scs, etc. "Would be waiting for me whenever I wanted it." I wanted to strengthen my protections and said "any consequence of this and including immediate prosecution for first and tertiary relations who seek to thieve and or besmirch my character," I was informed that I was protected strongly enough; that there wasn't anything more to do that would help me. [Whether or not some such change had occured to "better" protect me, I do npt know. There is an onlooker talking about a "judas" and should I have been best protected it doesnt much make sense that my rights would be shrunk, should there be another way to seek prosecution anyway. His father hadn't allowed something. Or he was "blocked" from something. I was concerned, but I took it in good faith, perhaps given my professors initial statement to me.] Which by way of this conversation includes these stipulations? I was asked about personal injury, he suggested "That's common sense, right? Or is that unrelated?" "I don't know, you tell me." "No that's included...How do you know so much about IP law?" "I don't know, I studied a bit, not this, but it makes sense right?" I had also been told often "life time #moratorium"
Regarding "legacy" I wanted to protect against #politicaldiscrimination by willing the work to my alma mater and someone in #my #schoolofthought i.e. #marxist and #postmodern